.

Proposed Animal Shelter Contract Called 'Unsuitable'

On Nov. 16, Lower Saucon Township Manager Jack Cahalan told township council that agreeing to the contract could be costly, and that alternatives to it are being sought.

Lower Saucon Township's proposed 2012 contract with the Center for Animal Health and Welfare--a Williams Township animal shelter that accepts stray pets from many local municipalities--was called "unsuitable" by township manager Jack Cahalan at council's Nov. 16 meeting.

Cahalan said the contract, which , includes new provisions that could be costly to the township.

In addition to an increased per-animal drop-off fee of $150, one of the provisions would no longer allow the township to limit the type of pet it pays to drop off at the shelter.

For the past five or six years, Cahalan said, the township has had a yearly agreement that specifies reimbursement for stray dogs only.

Under the new provision, however, "all animals could be dropped off," he said.

Another provision would allow individual residents to drop off stray animals, with the township receiving the bills in those instances.

"Someone can literally go up there under these provisions and drop 10 cats off and we'd be charged $1,500," Cahalan said.

Cahalan told council that the township is trying to negotiate different terms with the shelter, but said other options for dealing with strays are also being examined.

Council president Glenn Kern asked Cahalan if he knew why the terms had been changed so significantly, to which Cahalan responded, "I have no idea."

In response to the change in terms, he said, many other municipalities are currently re-evaluating their use of the Center for Animal Health and Welfare as a repository for stray pets.

"From what I'm hearing, the response (to the 2012 contract) is a resounding 'no' from all the municipalities," he said.

Stephanie Brown November 22, 2011 at 04:02 PM
Township manager Jack Cahalan had no idea why the terms of the contract had changed so significantly? Hey Jack, get a clue! It is the economy! Since the shelter changed to a no-kill shelter, it costs more money to feed and shelter animals at the facility. The township should not be immune from paying these increased costs if they want the services. So many people are giving up their animals due tot he bad economy, many due to the fact thaey have lost their homes or had to move from a home to an apartment. This facility relies heavily on volunteers and donations which in this bad economy are down. This shelter does a great service to the surrounding communities and should be compensated fairly for their services. I hope in the name of saving money, the township does not go with a kill shelter instead.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something