.
Feedback

Letter: Resident Says 'YES' to Landfill Expansion

Lower Saucon Township resident Kerry Kulp says IESI Bethlehem Landfill has been a good neighbor and an important contributor to the local economy.

Editor's Note: The following letter was written in response to .

Landfills are--and always will be--a very polarizing issue. Nobody, given the choice, would ask to have a landfill built in their backyard. However, we're not talking about building a new landfill. We're talking about expanding an existing landfill. The property in question will be a landfill forever. That can't be changed.

I have lived in Steel City and Lower Saucon Township for the last 14 years and have not had a single occasion to complain about the operation of the landfill. No smell. No noise. Nothing. Rather, the landfill has operated as a good neighbor and township citizen. That's not to say that no problems have occurred. Rainwater runoff and muddy washouts were discussed at great length during the last fact-finding council meeting. Mud and rocks on a roadway are absolutely a problem. Discussions about leachate detection and management are quite valid and were addressed at the last meeting. But the problems, in this case, have an owner that takes responsibility.

If this discussion were about building a new landfill on pristine land I would join others in saying NO. But it's not. We're talking about land that is already a landfill and is not suitable for any other use.

We're not talking about a landfill with operational issues or a long list of documented infractions or safety violations. Quite the opposite... We're talking about a landfill that is run responsibly and according to all applicable guidelines.

We're talking about a local employer that is providing income and benefits to a number of our township neighbors.

We're talking about a company that is contributing significantly to the economies of the township and the greater Lehigh Valley as a whole.

We're talking about an organization that is contributing approximately 30 percent of the overall township revenue. 

For all of these reasons, I say YES to the rezoning and expansion of the landfill.

Kerry Kulp

Lower Saucon Township

sc citizen October 16, 2012 at 10:00 pm
I say YES also - for many of the same reasons you discussed.
In addition- where are we to dispose of our garbage if the landfill closes? And what will that cost us? Maybe we all need to fire up a burn barrel like so many of the opposition do. By the way- I can smell your burn barrels from my house!
Louise October 17, 2012 at 04:47 am
Ms. Kulp, you said it all, BRAVO to you. Your letter states the true facts. Why should 75 to 100 residents make a decision in a Township with over 10,000 residents. Lower Saucon Township residents, get out there and support IESI and have Town Council say yes to rezoning.
http://bethlehemlandfill.com/
rocky October 17, 2012 at 07:57 am
I also live in steel city. However the land in question is pristinevl land that is not landfill rich now and could be useable for anything. Secondly. The township has approx 1 million in debt service that ends about the time the landfill is scheduled to close bringing that 30%number you speak about to approx 16% when the landfill closes. Futrthermore I purchased my property and built a home in steel city knowing that dump had a very limited life and that it would be capped and closed. I and my children visit the top of that mountain all the time and ruining it is a discrace. This may not be about opening a new dump but it is completley about ruining land that is not currently part of it.
Rocco Viscito Steel city resident
rocky October 17, 2012 at 07:58 am
Http://www.stopthelowersaucondump.com
rocky October 17, 2012 at 08:13 am
Id like to restate the budget number in another way. The budget includes approx 1 million in debt service so when it ends and the dump closes the net realized loss will be only approx 16% of the budget not 30% like I keep hearing
sc citizen October 17, 2012 at 04:52 pm
Oh- so a 16% increase makes it so much more affordable. Tell that to your neighbors on a fixed income. No wonder this country is going downhill. Why don't we close down all the businesses and ship everything over to China!
Kerry Kulp October 17, 2012 at 07:53 pm
The 30% reference was in regard to township revenue, not spending. While those debt payments you reference will end at or around the time the landfill is currently scheduled to close, the revenue would remain and can be put to use elsewhere in the budget.
Should the landfill be permitted to expand and the host fees remain the same, that $2 million per year of revenue could be used to lower township resident taxes or to save for future capital expenditures that may come after the landfill does finally close. $20 million additional dollars in the coffers over ten years can't hurt...
rocky October 18, 2012 at 11:36 am
Its funny everyone seems surprised about this tax increase that is going to happen yet the zoning has been in place and the fact that the landfill was going to run out of space has been known since they got the permits. Those of us opposed to the expansion are not asking for something other than what the original plan was. If someone bought here knowing there was a landfill then they also should have known that taxes were going to go up when it ran out if room to operate. We have not asked town council to close the landfill early rather we are asking them to stick to the plan that was designed years ago that was not opposed then. Do I want a tax increase? The obvious answer is no however I understood that that landfill was going to run out of land sooner than later and knew this was coming. Anyone who didn't see this coming is blind.
Louise October 18, 2012 at 12:02 pm
Things do change, plans do change. Are you going to pay our tax increases.
Kerry Kulp October 18, 2012 at 12:16 pm
For the sake of discussion, let's take the potential tax increase out of the equation. This is a fiscal responsibility issue. The township council has an obligation to the whole of Lower Saucon Township to make prudent, responsible fiscal decisions.
The township as a whole has already dealt with the issues and burden of hosting a landfill. There would not appear to be any additional burden as a result of the expansion of this already existing landfill. Truck traffic will not increase. Noise will not increase. Odor will not increase (as that is the result of open cells only). The only thing that will increase is the revenue earned by the township as a result of landfill expansion. I fully understand the concerns expressed by the opposition but this is a question of what is right for all of Lower Saucon Township. Not just a few.
rocky October 18, 2012 at 07:33 pm
So without the tax increase on the table, you still talk about money... It's all about the money, and as you put it- you fully understand the concerns, but is it your children they are moving closer too, is it your health being put at risk, or just the money they are putting in your pocket(or saving you-its about the same thing)? And by the way, they are asking for an increase in truck traffic, which will probably mean more revenue, making it even harder in 10 more years to close this dump due to greedy people who are only concerned about their pocket, and with attitudes like yours, they will ruin the entire side of the mountain bringing them, their noise, truck traffic, radiation, leachate, and associated health risks for god knows how much longer, closer and closer to my family.
rocky October 18, 2012 at 07:33 pm
As long as there is a dump there it is not likely any other business will atempt to move in because the dump is willing to pay amazingly inflated prices for the land. This will continue until there is no more land to be used, and as long as they know there are people who will continue to support them. No thought to the fact that every acre they use can never again be used, and that in the end we end up with dead land that will never bring in income again. So in the short run we are ok with doing whats "right" for the town- keeping the revenue coming for now, but is not irresposible to ignore the future of having the area unusable and never having rateables in that area again. I guess we all have different ideas of whats right for all of Lower Saucon Township.
rocky October 18, 2012 at 07:42 pm
to Louise, are you or your children close enough to this landfill to have health issues? are you going to be by my side if one of them has health issues and pay those bills, or... Its ok for the dump and its associated health risks and noise to move closer to me, just so long as your taxes don't go up. Heres to the future of humanity
Kerry Kulp October 18, 2012 at 07:56 pm
To some degree, everything is about money at some level. In this case, it's about our township losing a tremendous source of revenue that can be put to many good uses. Keeping resident taxes low is a nice benefit but it's not the only thing that money is good for. I'd be happy if they did nothing other than sock the money away in a rainy day fund. In addition, the continual argument that our debt will be paid off is meaningless unless the township agrees not to enter into any new capital projects. We know that's not going to happen so revenue is always needed.
I would stand right next to you in opposition if there was any documented concern for human health or safety. But, while nothing is absolute, all testimony has been to the contrary. I suspect that the trains transporting dangerous substances through Steel City residents backyards pose a much greater risk to public health and safety than the landfill...

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Hellertown-Lower Saucon Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mark Petruno June 11, 2013 at 06:28 pm
Hopefully, Bud Prosser or Danny Ruth reads this article ... they would be of great assistance....
Roger Jurczak June 12, 2013 at 03:21 pm
This information is being sent to the Saucon Valley Conservancy which operates/ manages the HellerRead More Homestead. While Bud and Dan cast a larger net, I believe the Homestead might be a better place to start.
Daniel Ruth June 12, 2013 at 04:02 pm
Geez, wouldn't it be great IF they could hold their reunion right at the Homestead??
Allan Bach June 11, 2013 at 03:13 pm
Of course, Eric, one could fall out of bed due to an IED exploding in the next room. YourRead More Niemöller quote is often used to show how being silenced, usually through fear, will eventually play out. Today it may read: They came for the: 1) Christians (not endorsing homosexual marriage, abortion, or contraceptives) 2) Conservatives (having the audacity to desire a budget, reasonable taxation, and a Constitutional government) 3) People who post on Patch, and similar sites, having opinions with which others disagree, prompting name calling and ridiculing of the opinion writer. Andrew's piece is his expression of his government. Should events keep unraveling, though, I don't think he will have anyone for which to vote in upcoming elections.
Wazzy June 11, 2013 at 03:21 pm
The difference is, i am ok with this and it does affect me. I speak out on what i beleive to beRead More injustices and cruelties to both man and animal, putting my money where my mouth is as well. Including the many times i have raised both my voice and my pen to the fact that we are removing God from our country and the terrible affect it has had. May i recommend the movie "Last Ounce of Courage" .
Eric W June 11, 2013 at 06:12 pm
Allan, I agree with what you've said, religion in general and Christians in particular have beenRead More targeted and compromised, conservatives are the target du jour for the IRS, anyone wanting a Constitutional government is on the possible terrorist list, voicing an opinion contrary to the state's views is now considered treason. Finding that you have no one to vote for comes on the road to enlightenment, that there is no practical difference in politics between Republicans and Democrats in the things that matter, namely The Rule of Law and prosecuting fraud and corruption. Speaking of which, one area that Andrew left out that has, IMO, contributed significantly to anti-US feeling is the financial frauds and shenanigans invented and used by Wall Street and the US too-big-too-fail, too-rich-to-jail bankers and financial manipulators. Talk about an evil empire! They make a billion, and thousands die of starvation. They make a trillion, and a million get foreclosed on. And, more often than not, they rewrite the laws to make what used to be considered fraudulent and immoral, legal and GAAP.
Hugh Gallagher June 11, 2013 at 09:34 am
The phone call monitoring is only a PART of the spying . You didn't mention the other parts of it..Read More But,in the last paragraph, you make the judgement "successful policy without damaging the right of Americans from the danger of big brother". You apparently trust the motives and good intentions of all of those politicos who have access to the data that has been mined. None of us , however, know the extent of that data.
Allan Bach June 11, 2013 at 11:13 am
In the perfect world of Joel Katz, the United States would have one political party. RepublicansRead More (hypocrites or not) would be damned. Must everything be seen through the lens of political party? Isn't it possible that, no matter who is in office, breaches of power exist and mistakes are made? Our Republic is based on laws. Why? Because the natural tendency of people is to act with self in mind, many times ignoring how our actions may affect others. As I've said many times, if people ignore speed limit signs on I78, why would those same people abide by some Constitution prohibiting searches without warrant? I agree with Joel about protecting our citizens by "abridging civil liberties". However, the NSA, FBI and CIA have, with the new digital technology, surveillance powers over our own citizens that the Stasi – the secret police in the former "democratic republic" of East Germany – could scarcely have dreamed of. Let's put this in perspective. Democrat, Republican, or other party affiliation does not guarantee our rights as citizens will be protected. This is a matter of responsibility of those elected to abide by our laws. Welcome to the Internet world of data warehousing, Joel. Because we've used certain key words, our posts are now being stored in the NSA Data center in Utah.
Arthur Joel Katz June 11, 2013 at 12:27 pm
Allan Bach's comment is well thought out. My only disagreement with it is his suggestion that IRead More would prefer one party rule, the likelihood of which is nonexistent. To be clear, I don't countenance the government reading our emails or listening in to our telephone calls without a warrant. Otherwise, I don't see that tracking communications (without reference to content) is so severe a violation of our civil rights that we should sacrifice our safety by banning it.
Stephanie May 1, 2013 at 09:04 pm
I have a yardsale that day so I can't make it and I'm so bummed! If you have fleece or other itemsRead More that fray well and would be good for rag quilts or blanketsl leftover please let me know! Stephie_lou2@hotmail.com. I'm new and just started these so I'm super bummed!
Jeanine Dimmick May 23, 2013 at 01:37 am
Hi Stephanie, We have flannel-- solids and prints still available, and flannel frays well. PrettyRead More sure cotton/poly also frays well, and we have a good deal of that. We have fleece but I do not think it frays- it can be cut w/fringe on the edge and it maintains the fringed edge. Also makes great blankets. My e-mail is jdimmick@cavtel.net. Please reply and we can set up an appt.! Jeanine
Dawn Newman January 5, 2013 at 09:21 pm
HAPPY TO REPORT...TEQUILA has been found and is SAFELY back home with me... THANKS TO EVERYONE WHORead More HELPED US FIND HIM!!! We would have never been able to find him without your help!
Dane Janas May 31, 2013 at 02:40 am
I do sympathize with this letter to the editor, however, a "do not enter" sign is exactlyRead More that, whether you are accessing businesses beyond that sign or not. Nobody goes the wrong way on Clarke Street just because they want to go to CVS; the same is true here. As someone who lives in this immediate area and who uses Hess Avenue daily to access his home, I do however understand the writer's frustration with the new traffic patterns that have been forcibly imposed on Hellertown's north end. However, I've had too many close calls at the barricades at the end of Hess Avenue to sympathize any longer. The road from Main Street to Oak Alley is one way west, there are a large "do not enter" sign, two "road closed" signs and two "one way" signs correctly stating this in that area; the same is also true for Roth Avenue. I realize the gas station and garage being there pose a problem, but it is breaking the law. I live right near the barricades and never have a reason to go around them. Do the right thing - go around to High Street, sit in traffic with everyone else, and access the businesses at the end of Hess Avenue that way. I don't like it either, but it's just how it is now. And a warning to all reading this article - MANY residents of Hess Avenue and the surrounding streets have complained about motorists' blatant disregard for these "one-way" barricades, and police have agreed to be stationed at the ends of Hess and Roth Avenues much more often going forward.
Dane Janas May 31, 2013 at 02:44 am
However, I also think the barricades should be moved closer to Main Street, allowing people toRead More access the gas station, but not to exit onto Main Street using Hess Avenue. Essentially keep the barricades how they are, but move them up to the entrance to Main Street.
Vida Frankenfield May 31, 2013 at 05:11 pm
I know you must obey the law, and most of us drivers do, on the other hand, they (constuctionRead More companies) could also make it easier to obey the law by considering where the barriers are placed for the convenience of the drivers, who need to get into certain areas without the entrance being blocked.
Christine Widgren May 24, 2013 at 02:33 pm
When I try to take an alternate route into Easton, I encounter "Road Closed" barricadesRead More along Industrial Drive and try another route through Glendon along the Lehigh and there are massive barricades and closed roads and bridges there as well. Add to that the High Street debacle where work has not even started yet. But the Rail Trail advocates must be happy....now they can walk anywhere they want between Hellertown and Bethehem and not encounter any moving vehicles.
Hugh Gallagher May 25, 2013 at 09:52 am
Today I watched the Dewey ambulance try to go north on a jammed 412. It makes no difference if youRead More blow your siren and flash your lights, when the street is clogged, cars can't yield for the emergency vehicle if there is no place to go. This goes beyond inconvenience. It is a safety issue.
Hugh Gallagher May 25, 2013 at 10:20 pm
There are 2 areas of congestion that are very short in length (less than 100') where widening wasRead More started 8-9 months ago but not completed. These are the Silvex Rd between Wendy's + Turkey Hill and the stretch of Main St northbound between Cherry Ln + the 78 eastbound ramp. If these 2 areas were made available for travel, it would help reduce the congestion. Cars could then leave the Park + Ride and turn directly onto Main St . This would also make it easier for them to go straight onto the westbound ramp. At the other area, if a right turn only lane was made available from Cherry Ln to the eastbound ramp, it would eliminate some congestion.
GrowUpSaucon May 16, 2013 at 09:31 pm
From my personal experience with this sorry excuse for school board members, Everyone -includingRead More Ralph Puerta and Ed Inghrim do not give a hoot about the taxpayer.
Arthur Joel Katz May 16, 2013 at 09:46 pm
Dear Ralph, While I do not withdraw what I said, I appreciate your handling this in your usualRead More friend polite manner, and I appreciate your friendship which I certainly return.
Mark Morawski May 20, 2013 at 11:57 pm
To Mr. Puerta, I have been a resident of Saucon Valley for 16 years. In that time, most of thatRead More with you on the school board, my taxes have nearly DOUBLED. Teacher Salaries, have wait for it.... nearly DOUBLED. Our test scores, well I wish I could say they Doubled too, but well..... For you to be running as a fiscal conservative is as amazing a bought of hipocracy as I have ever witnessed in Politics..... Please if I am wrong, correct me. Let me know what the Millage rate was when you took office, and what it is today? or perhaps the per student funding when you took office (to a larger enrollment) and what it is today..... Or perhaps the average teacher salary..... Or even better the annual raises for the union when you were Schoolboard chairman? Don't get me wrong, you have been a duly elected Collectivist ( means the subjugation of the individual (in this case tax payer) to a group (the NEA).... Perhaps a leopard does change his spots..... You will probably be re-elected by populace and your challenge is to be the fiscal conservative you now purport yourself to be....
Arthur Joel Katz May 17, 2013 at 12:00 pm
6. Just for the record, I have opposed the last three teachers" strikes and I am not in favorRead More of just throwing money at problems. 7. If the board was serious and the community was serious, they would have adopted my suggestion that all athletics at Saucon be abandoned and the saving, about a million dollars, would be used for educational purposes. When I made that suggestion at one of the superintendent's meeting to develop a million dollars in savings, Bryan Eichfeld rose from the audience to say that he liked my intention but he thought the schools should provide for a well rounded education. There was no sense in pointing out the irony to Bryan that he had favored cutting teachers, purchase of need books and other educational improvements to graduate "well rounded" students who could play football, basket ball and field hockey but couldn't think. Bryan, of course, is now on the board. 8. I agree with Bert that the outsourcing of the buses is a terrible idea for exactly the reasons that Bert says it is.
Bryan Eichfeld May 17, 2013 at 08:51 pm
I love ya, of course I'm against books....I'm a neanterthal....I opposed one book and that was aRead More propaganda piece that in every chapter clearly stated that Man-made global was destroying the environment in all areas of the world.... and again you ignore that our Student to teacher ratio is lower than when you were on the board... we didn't replace some retiring teachers to keep things in balance. It is interesting that when I try to find this back and forth on the Patch, you can't find it anymore so I guess I will stop wasting my time on this.
Mark Morawski May 21, 2013 at 05:16 pm
Dear Mr Katz,, I am sorry I didnt find the patch sooner. Please explain why you didnt disclose theRead More Teachers union affiliation of those you endorsed?.... Perhaps the public doesnt need to know? Also please take a position and state what you think our teachers who average a Measly 98K a year for working 5.5 hours per day, for a 160 days work a year are entitled too? Its ok to write editorials, but they should disclose the facts and backgrounds..... There are two Fiscal Conservatives running in this election, and an additional two who are self purportedly reformed big spenders.... the rest of the candidates are NEA members or the family of the same... The saddest part of the whole thing is what are we getting for our investment of paying teachers in the top 5% nationally? Certainly not top 5% test scores.... Yes I am a parent of two Saucon Valley students by the way.
Chris May 19, 2013 at 04:42 am
The main reason behind the new traffic patterns this for the widening of 412 is retarded like IRead More myself do not think it's gonna make any difference in driving and I'm going to start driving next year the main road factor area they should start working on is the High Street wooden bridge if I had to show the Borough of Hellertown how many turn around there are at that bridge and how many people still pull forward to that bridge to see if it's closed than that would be better seeing that being fixed than 412 I really don't see the idea of 412 like Penndot does not think outside the box at all with there decisions
maryann reichard May 19, 2013 at 04:03 pm
sounds like a good idea , & reopen shimersville right turn lane to keep that traffic movingRead More instead of piling up at the light
Andrew Meilinger May 22, 2013 at 01:44 am
The bridges are not in helertown nor are they the towns responsibility.