patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What a Crazy Way to Run a Party

The Republican Party should fire the caterer.

 

In the interests of full disclosure, as they say on television, I admit that I am a registered Democrat (surprise!). Technically, therefore, it is none of my business who wins the Republican nomination to be its standard-bearer against Barack Obama, except that as a patriotic citizen I often worry about the safety of our country. Accordingly, I have followed the races of the Republican candidates running for president with more than a little interest...or maybe “horror” is a better word.

The common prediction at the moment, on the basis of results from two states with tiny populations, is that Mitt Romney will be the presidential nominee. But hold on there. Not so long ago, Barry Goldwater, then known as Mr. Conservative, was running against Nelson Rockefeller, the Republican liberal governor of New York, and Goldwater’s hold on the nomination wasn’t secured until Goldwater won the California Republican primary by the closest of margins.  All that glitters for Romney, therefore, may not be gold. The problem seems to be that while Romney is not very popular with a majority of the Republican primary voters, they have not been able to settle on an “anti-Romney” candidate who they think will be able to beat the Republican “anti-Christ” Obama. 

Be it remembered that Goldwater was slaughtered in the presidential election of 1964 by Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater only won New Mexico and four states of what was then considered the "solid south," for a total of about nine percent of the electoral vote.

In a field of such heavyweights as Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Jon Huntsman and the aforesaid Mitt Romney, only Huntsman has exhibited the slightest talent for what it takes to be president, and his chances of winning the nomination have now been reduced from a glimmer to a pinpoint. The way to vote in the Republican primaries is “none of the above.” That way, you can’t be disappointed in your selection and you can save a not-so-small fortune in campaign funds. On the other hand, I urge all Republican contributors to spend their money in the primary season. It helps the economy and doesn’t leave much for the presidential election itself.

Aha, you say, but what about principle? The truth is that with what each Republican primary candidate has said about the other primary candidates, none of them have any principles at all. They are, according to their opponents: liars, adulterers, job-killers, favoring immigrants over true Ammerricans [stet], anti-capitalist, too pro-capitalist, and the like. According to their peers, they have certainly flip-flopped over the years on practically all issues. The single exception may be Ron Paul. That is the good news about Paul. The bad news is that the policies that he has consistently espoused would result, if he was elected president, in a country so stuck with its head in the sand, that it would never realize it was being swamped by a tsunami. Most of the presidential voters have surely noticed this. Accordingly, his chances of becoming president are no better than Barry Goldwater, and Goldwater is dead.

Even faith-based voters, who believe that Paul or Santorum is chosen by God, when they examine their souls, can’t believe that one of these candidates is electable. God, they may hope, will intervene to elect their candidate, but may I say that He never did before. It seems likely that God doesn’t involve himself in political campaigns. Otherwise, it is hard to understand how Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini and Saddam Hussein reached power. God may work in mysterious ways, but not that mysteriously.

It is widely said, and not just among Democrats, that this is the worst group of candidates since the Republican Party was founded just prior to the Civil War. Its second candidate, and the first elected, was Abraham Lincoln. What a contrast! Where is Calvin Coolidge or Herbert Hoover when we need him? Good grief, Charlie Brown.

These are very serious and difficult times for our country. If we are to recover our prosperity, our safety, and our stature in the world, we have to treat the presidency seriously. The "just say no" policies of the Republican congress have to stop. If the Republicans can’t find a serious candidate, Barack Obama will be re-elected. I believe that is a good thing, but many Republicans may not. If that happens, they will have only themselves to blame.

About this column: Arthur Joel Katz (he generally is called “Joel”) was born in the dim past (1928). He graduated from Columbia Law School, practiced for three years and then entered the entertainment business, first in an agency and then for six years with Herb Brodkin’s Plautus Productions as Executive Vice President, where he produced more than 80 shows for network television. He then surrendered to Hollywood, working as a producer or executive for about 25 years for such companies as Universal Pictures, MGM, NBC, Playboy and Westinghouse. He spent the better part of three years in the former USSR producing a mini-series for NBC. He moved to the Saucon Valley about 20 years ago, where he has entertained himself writing columns for various local newspapers and writing “Making Harriet,” a novel about Hollywood. Related Topics: Jon Huntsman, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, presidential election, and republican candidates

Mary Anne Looby

9:33 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

As a registered Democrat, who has only voted with my party once in my long lifetime, I have to agree with you Joel. The race between the Republican candidates is what our younger generation refers to a a "clusterf...". I won't vote for President Obama, he hasn't lived up to his promises, plus I don't like him as a person (just a gut reaction which has never really failed me). My only wish is that all the money that has been raised for him could be used to offset the national debt. The Republicans have made him the only choice by their inability to put forth a viable candidate. He really has no need to campaign.

Reply

windwardtack

10:36 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

Huntsman said he would have signed NDAA and he is willing to have a land invasion of Iran. I understand he is a Democrat, really, and Democrats who elected Obama, who also, obviously, signed NDAA might be wiling to overlook that, but I'm not.

Reply

Eastward

10:46 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

Tripe. Nice dismissal of Ron Paul -- typical response to someone who clearly doesn't espouse the group think that the establishment enforces. Ron Paul 2012.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Anne Looby

10:51 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

One could hope, but Romney's pockets are deep.

Comment_arrow

Louis Nardozi

11:56 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

There are millions of us who will vote for Paul and not one else. The Party might want to consider how many national, state and local seats they want to lose as a direct result of their attempts to disenfranchise Paul.

http://RonPaulPomise.com

m00nsuit

10:52 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

I think a big part of the problem is how the primary elections work. Basically it forces from day 1 decisions based on speculation on probability of a candidate winning instead of letting voters choose on merit. That's why Romney is where he is, not because most Republicans like him the best. Ron Paul is my pick and last time I voted for Obama who failed to get it done.

Reply

Zach Martin

11:30 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

Paul polls even in head to head with Obama. How can you say he's "unelectable?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Anne Looby

11:33 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

That's great, but he has to win the Primary first. Can he do that?

Comment_arrow

Erin Monday

12:19 pm on Sunday, January 15, 2012

Hi Mary Anne. Yes, he absolutely can. Ron Paul has 10 delegates to Romney's 12. And in SC, the next primary state, he's been polled at 20% to Romney's 29%.

It's a close thing, but when you consider how often the mainstream media has decried Paul and his ideas, it's an exceptional thing. It's people thinking for themselves, not believing what they're spoonfed and voting on principle.

George Hewes

11:33 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

you should have said that Huntsman is the only one in this field who has demonstrated an ability to run a country as it has been run in the past.. that is,.. run into a hole.

Democrats need to get in the race to cut back on our bloated and oppressive government, or they will become a footnote.

Reply

Donald Dimmick

1:32 pm on Sunday, January 15, 2012

100% Agree with George Hawes. Former Democrats like myself are 100% are ready to leave the party and become a Republican for life if Ron Paul gets his due in the Republican Primary. You better hope the neoconservatives win and the joint media, GOP, and Democrats get their way or 40% of the Democrats who elected Obama are gone forever. Ron Paul 2012: The Only Choice for an American.

Reply

Jackson Baer

7:21 pm on Sunday, January 15, 2012

I'm really hoping Ron Paul surprises with a first or strong second in South Carolina. Santorum is the worst candidate (along with Perry) and Paul is the only one I can get behind. Freedom & liberty are important to me.

http://www.whatthehellbook.com/2012/01/05/fired-for-not-believing-in-hell/

Reply

charles hampton

8:40 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012

Yes, I can't wait to turn back the calendar, open a sweat shop, pollute some public waters, and perhaps own me a slave or two!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Anne Looby

7:36 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

I would venture to guess you are the only person who feels this way. Thank you Jesus!

Leave a comment